I have the same view. They will try to deflect any blame for any attack on western corporations. They might raise a stink for a little bit. It will be interesting to see what happens to google, if they close up shop or raid the google data center.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:12 PM, iamnowonmai <[email protected]> wrote: > Like it or not they need us to buy their stuff. I don't see them doing a damn > thing personally > > Michael Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > >>It will be interesting to see what China does. They could just take >>over Google.cn and seize the server farm as state property. It might >>make other companies think twice about doing business in China. >> >>-mmiller >> >>On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Karl Schuttler >><[email protected]> wrote: >>> In case you didn't see >>> it... http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html >>> >>> "We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results >>> on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the >>> Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search >>> engine within the law, if at all. We recognize that this may well mean >>> having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China." >>> Karl >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Robert Portvliet >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I hope Google pulls out of China... but before they do make every >>>> search return >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989 >>>> :) >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Adrian Crenshaw <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > Odd, to quote the email: >>>> > >>>> > Technology Alert >>>> > from The Wall Street Journal >>>> > >>>> > Google said it is "reviewing the feasibility of our business operations >>>> > in >>>> > China" and may back out of China entirely, as it disclosed it had been >>>> > hit >>>> > with major cyberattacks it believes originated from the country. >>>> > >>>> > In a blog post, Google said it detected a "highly sophisticated and >>>> > targeted >>>> > attack on our corporate infrastructure originating from China" in >>>> > mid-December and that the attack resulted in "the theft of intellectual >>>> > property from Google." >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126333757451026659.html?mod=djemalertTECH >>>> > >>>> > Since the WSJ wants you to pay, see: >>>> > >>>> > http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html >>>> > >>>> > I hope they cover this on ISD tonight. >>>> > >>>> > Adrian >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Pauldotcom mailing list >>>> > [email protected] >>>> > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom >>>> > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Robert Portvliet, >>>> GPEN, Security + >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pauldotcom mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom >>>> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pauldotcom mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom >>> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com >>> >>_______________________________________________ >>Pauldotcom mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom >>Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com > _______________________________________________ > Pauldotcom mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com _______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
