paws  

Messages by Date

• 2012/02/08 [paws] UC&R I-D: section 4.8 (Mobility) scott.probasco
• 2012/02/08 Re: [paws] Separating business process data from spectrum use data Stine, John A.
• 2012/02/08 Re: [paws] UC&R I-D: Section 4.5 Offloading: moving traffic to a white space network andy.sago
• 2012/02/07 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Gabor.Bajko
• 2012/02/07 [paws] UC&R I-D: Section 4.5 Offloading: moving traffic to a white space network Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/02/07 Re: [paws] Separating business process data from spectrum use data Gabor.Bajko
• 2012/02/07 Re: [paws] UC&R I-D: section 4.3 (Hotspot: urban internet connectivity service) Nancy Bravin
• 2012/02/07 Re: [paws] UC&R I-D: section 4.3 (Hotspot: urban internet connectivity service) scott.probasco
• 2012/02/07 Re: [paws] UC&R I-D: section 4.3 (Hotspot: urban internet connectivity service) scott.probasco
• 2012/02/07 [paws] Separating business process data from spectrum use data Stine, John A.
• 2012/02/06 Re: [paws] UC&R I-D: section 4.3 (Hotspot: urban internet connectivity service) Nancy Bravin
• 2012/02/06 Re: [paws] UC&R I-D: section 4.3 (Hotspot: urban internet connectivity service) Paul Lambert
• 2012/02/06 Re: [paws] wondering why a device identifier is needed (was: Re: Threat model (Rev 3)) scott.probasco
• 2012/02/06 Re: [paws] UC&R I-D: section 4.3 (Hotspot: urban internet connectivity service) andy.sago
• 2012/02/06 Re: [paws] wondering why a device identifier is needed (was: Re: Threat model (Rev 3)) Paul Lambert
• 2012/02/06 Re: [paws] UC&R I-D: section 4.3 (Hotspot: urban internet connectivity service) scott.probasco
• 2012/02/06 Re: [paws] registration protocol scott.probasco
• 2012/02/06 Re: [paws] FCC OET Requests Comments on Testing of Telcordia TV Bands Database Malyar, John P
• 2012/02/06 Re: [paws] UC&R I-D: section 4.3 (Hotspot: urban internet connectivity service) andy.sago
• 2012/02/05 Re: [paws] wondering why a device identifier is needed (was: Re: Threat model (Rev 3)) Stephen Farrell
• 2012/02/05 Re: [paws] wondering why a device identifier is needed (was: Re: Threat model (Rev 3)) Rosen, Brian
• 2012/02/04 Re: [paws] Threat model Teco Boot
• 2012/02/04 Re: [paws] draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt Teco Boot
• 2012/02/04 Re: [paws] wondering why a device identifier is needed (was: Re: Threat model (Rev 3)) Stephen Farrell
• 2012/02/04 [paws] registration protocol Peter Stanforth
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] wondering why a device identifier is needed (was: Re: Threat model (Rev 3)) scott.probasco
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] wondering why a device identifier is needed (was: Re: Threat model (Rev 3)) Paul Lambert
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Nancy Bravin
• 2012/02/03 [paws] wondering why a device identifier is needed (was: Re: Threat model (Rev 3)) Stephen Farrell
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Paul Lambert
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Paul Lambert
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Paul Lambert
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Paul Lambert
• 2012/02/03 [paws] UC&R I-D: section 4.7 (Rapid deployed network for emergency scenario) scott.probasco
• 2012/02/03 [paws] UC&R I-D: section 4.3 (Hotspot: urban internet connectivity service) scott.probasco
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Stephen Farrell
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Rosen, Brian
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Rosen, Brian
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Joel M. Halpern
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Rosen, Brian
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Joel M. Halpern
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 3) Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt Rosen, Brian
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt Rex Buddenberg
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt Rosen, Brian
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt Rex Buddenberg
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt scott.probasco
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt andy.sago
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 2) Stephen Farrell
• 2012/02/03 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 2) Stephen Farrell
• 2012/02/02 Re: [paws] draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt Teco Boot
• 2012/02/02 Re: [paws] Use cases and requirements: sections 9 and 11 (Summary and Conclusion, References) scott.probasco
• 2012/02/02 Re: [paws] draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt scott.probasco
• 2012/02/02 Re: [paws] draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt Teco Boot
• 2012/02/02 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 2) Gabor.Bajko
• 2012/02/02 Re: [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' Nancy Bravin
• 2012/02/02 Re: [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' scott.probasco
• 2012/02/02 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 2) Nancy Bravin
• 2012/02/02 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 2) Nancy Bravin
• 2012/02/02 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 2) Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/02/02 Re: [paws] Threat model (Rev 2) Stephen Farrell
• 2012/02/02 [paws] Threat model (Rev 2) Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/02/02 Re: [paws] Threat model Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/02/02 Re: [paws] draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt scott.probasco
• 2012/02/02 Re: [paws] UC&R I-D: section 4.1 (TVWS database discovery, device registration with trusted database) scott.probasco
• 2012/02/02 Re: [paws] draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt andy.sago
• 2012/02/02 Re: [paws] UC&R I-D: section 4.1 (TVWS database discovery, device registration with trusted database) andy.sago
• 2012/02/02 Re: [paws] Threat model Gabor.Bajko
• 2012/02/02 [paws] UC&R I-D: section 4.1 (TVWS database discovery, device registration with trusted database) scott.probasco
• 2012/02/02 [paws] terminology Nancy Bravin
• 2012/02/01 [paws] FCC OET Requests Comments on Testing of Telcordia TV Bands Database Nancy Bravin
• 2012/02/01 Re: [paws] Threats, Services and Predicatable Availability Stephen Farrell
• 2012/01/31 Re: [paws] Threats, Services and Predicatable Availability Rosen, Brian
• 2012/01/31 Re: [paws] Threats, Services and Predicatable Availability Stephen Farrell
• 2012/01/31 Re: [paws] Threats, Services and Predicatable Availability Paul Lambert
• 2012/01/31 Re: [paws] Use cases and requirements I-D: sections 1 to 3 (Introduction, Conventions and Terminology, Prior Work) scott.probasco
• 2012/01/31 Re: [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' Paul Lambert
• 2012/01/31 Re: [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/31 Re: [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' Gerald Chouinard
• 2012/01/31 Re: [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/31 Re: [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' M.K.Sajeev
• 2012/01/31 Re: [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' Gerald Chouinard
• 2012/01/31 Re: [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' Nancy Bravin
• 2012/01/30 Re: [paws] Threats, Services and Predicatable Availability Paul Lambert
• 2012/01/30 Re: [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' Gerald Chouinard
• 2012/01/30 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg -Correction Gabor.Bajko
• 2012/01/30 Re: [paws] Threats, Services and Predicatable Availability Stephen Farrell
• 2012/01/30 Re: [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' Paul Lambert
• 2012/01/30 Re: [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' Gabor.Bajko
• 2012/01/30 Re: [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' Rosen, Brian
• 2012/01/30 Re: [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' Paul Lambert
• 2012/01/30 [paws] Threats, Services and Predicatable Availability Paul Lambert
• 2012/01/30 Re: [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' Peter Stanforth
• 2012/01/30 Re: [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' Nancy Bravin
• 2012/01/30 Re: [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' Malyar, John P
• 2012/01/30 [paws] Discussion on 'license-exempt' vs 'unlicensed' Gerald Chouinard
• 2012/01/30 Re: [paws] Threat model Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/30 Re: [paws] Use cases and requirements I-D: sections 1 to 3 (Introduction, Conventions and Terminology, Prior Work) andy.sago
• 2012/01/30 Re: [paws] Threat model Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/30 Re: [paws] Use cases and requirements I-D: sections 1 to 3 (Introduction, Conventions and Terminology, Prior Work) andy.sago
• 2012/01/30 Re: [paws] Use cases and requirements: sections 9 and 11 (Summary and Conclusion, References) andy.sago
• 2012/01/30 Re: [paws] Use cases and requirements: sections 9 and 11 (Summary and Conclusion, References) gerald . chouinard
• 2012/01/30 [paws] Use cases and requirements: sections 9 and 11 (Summary and Conclusion, References) scott.probasco
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] Threat model Paul Lambert
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] Threat model Rosen, Brian
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] Threat model Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] Threat model Joel M. Halpern
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] Threat model Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] Threat model Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] Threat model Peter Saint-Andre
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt scott.probasco
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] Threat model Joel M. Halpern
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] Threat model Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] Threat model Joel M. Halpern
• 2012/01/27 [paws] Threat model Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] Security Requirements (was: next steps for the wg) Stephen Farrell
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] Security Requirements (was: next steps for the wg) Peter Saint-Andre
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] WG activity Peter Saint-Andre
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt Teco Boot
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt scott.probasco
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] re proposed edits on rev 2 scott.probasco
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] re proposed edits on rev 2 scott.probasco
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] re proposed edits on rev 2 Teco Boot
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] re proposed edits on rev 2 Peter Stanforth
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] re proposed edits on rev 2 Teco Boot
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] re proposed edits on rev 2 andy.sago
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] re proposed edits on rev 2 Nancy Bravin
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] re proposed edits on rev 2 jussi.kahtava
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] re proposed edits on rev 2 andy.sago
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt Teco Boot
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] re proposed edits on rev 2 Teco Boot
• 2012/01/27 Re: [paws] re proposed edits on rev 2 jussi.kahtava
• 2012/01/26 [paws] paws edit to rev 2 Nancy Bravin
• 2012/01/26 [paws] re proposed edits on rev 2 Nancy Bravin
• 2012/01/26 [paws] draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt scott.probasco
• 2012/01/26 [paws] I-D Action: draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-02.txt internet-drafts
• 2012/01/26 Re: [paws] proposed edits Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/26 [paws] proposed edits Nancy Bravin
• 2012/01/25 [paws] Use cases and requirements I-D: Section 5 Problem Statement scott.probasco
• 2012/01/25 [paws] Use cases and requirements I-D: sections 1 to 3 (Introduction, Conventions and Terminology, Prior Work) scott.probasco
• 2012/01/20 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Malyar, John P
• 2012/01/20 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/20 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Peter Stanforth
• 2012/01/20 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/20 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg scott.probasco
• 2012/01/20 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg andy.sago
• 2012/01/19 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Nancy Bravin
• 2012/01/19 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg andy.sago
• 2012/01/19 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg scott.probasco
• 2012/01/19 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg scott.probasco
• 2012/01/19 Re: [paws] P.3 Requirement (was: next steps for the wg) Rex Buddenberg
• 2012/01/19 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Joel M. Halpern
• 2012/01/19 Re: [paws] P.3 Requirement (was: next steps for the wg) Teco Boot
• 2012/01/19 Re: [paws] Security Requirements (was: next steps for the wg) Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/19 Re: [paws] Security Requirements (was: next steps for the wg) Gabor.Bajko
• 2012/01/19 Re: [paws] P.3 Requirement (was: next steps for the wg) Gabor.Bajko
• 2012/01/19 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Rosen, Brian
• 2012/01/19 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Nancy Bravin
• 2012/01/19 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Peter Stanforth
• 2012/01/18 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg andy.sago
• 2012/01/18 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/18 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Rosen, Brian
• 2012/01/18 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg andy.sago
• 2012/01/18 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/18 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Joel M. Halpern
• 2012/01/18 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/17 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Joel M. Halpern
• 2012/01/17 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/17 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Peter Stanforth
• 2012/01/17 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/17 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Peter Stanforth
• 2012/01/17 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/17 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/17 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/17 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Basavaraj.Patil
• 2012/01/17 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Peter Saint-Andre
• 2012/01/17 Re: [paws] next steps for the wg Peter Saint-Andre
• 2012/01/12 [paws] New TVWS Book Dr. Rashid Saeed
• 2012/01/12 [paws] next steps for the wg Gabor.Bajko
• 2012/01/11 Re: [paws] WG activity Gabor.Bajko
• 2012/01/11 [paws] WG activity Peter Saint-Andre

• Later messages