I join the chorus of those who do not take serious anyone who is in defence of the morally reprehensible and easily corruptible Zuma,to say the least.Concequently,you also are not worthy of being taken serious manelisi. How does one within the Pan Africanist fold even begin to conceive a defence for the man, is beyond me. Apart from emotions and political bankruptcy, the are no logical and rational basis to remain in defence of the man. Apart from his deeds, but if you have ever listened to him, which I have had bad luck of having had, it is enough for one to feel Sorry for the man. Sorry not for the sentimental reasons as shared by those who think like you,if you go through that phase at all.But Sory for the fact that in absence of the best, he is the worst that emerged.Sory for the fact that the world will expect a lot from him, when he even does not have a clue.Sory for the fact that after he has presided over this country's heritage, wealth,potential, et cetera, people will not care that apartheid even existed. He will be the worst thing that has happened to this land, figuratively and literaly.The DA might be a white supremacist organisation, as you rightly claim, but whether you are PAC or PAM, you share with them the identity as being a typical post-94 political party, and cease to be a liberation movement you so artificially claim to be. As if the formation of PAM was not enough, but Plaatie's latest utterances, which you are so proud that it sparked debate, has opened an alley for him to the dolldrums and the dustbin of South African politics, and permanenlty this time. >>> <[email protected]> 02/19/09 10:05 AM >>>
It is Not only you who is disappointed with the PAM President's pronouncement Son of the Soil, the DA (white sepremacist organisation) was equally disappointed. Those who think that we fought for the creation of the Scorpions Not total liberation are equally disappointed. But those who know that the 500 000 Zuma allegendly received is not a threat to economic and political stability were not disappointed. Why on earth would you spend millions of tax payers moneys chasing a mere 500 000. It makes no political /economic / business sense whatsoever. Go ahead and try and manipulate the electorate using Zuma's mistakes. As you point to Zuma, you must also know that the rest of you own fingers are pointing at you. The statement by President Plaatjie of the Pan Africanist Movement of Azania has to be applauded. It has generated much debate, and he must be as contreversial as possible if need be. There are no saints and angels in this revolution. Manelisi Luxande > Izwe Lethu > > I could not help but left wondering if not utterly dissapointed at PAM's > pronouncement through its leader,kaPlaatjie, on the Jacob Zuma - Arms > Deal Sagga. At its announcement about its victory and registration with > the IEC for the upcoming elections, PAM called for the cancellation of > Zuma's prosecution. Joining the chorus of those who make unfounded > statements and misguiding utterances,ka Plaatjie also spoke of a > political mendling and a whichhunt against Zuma,something we have heard > enough from the Blades,Vavis and the likes. You might be wondering > comrades as to why I'm bringing this issue on this forum, but these are > the very same people,in fact comrades, who swear on the names of > Sobukwe,Nkrumah,Motopeng and others, and whom we are all Pan Africanists > with, faction or not. Now for them to make such statements,mimicing the > aforementioned noncompoops of South African politics, is distgusting to > say the least.How does Plaatjie lament at Mbeki's dismissal last > September, but with the very same token, makes the very statemtments > that sealed Mbeki's fate, that of politlical conspiracy and the related > gabbage that's used to excuse Zuma from facing the music? If Mr. > Plaatjie, and anyone who thinks alike on this issue, could answer these > simple but semi-legal questions maybe I might be convinced; who did > Shabir Shaik corrupt when he was convicted for corruption; who did he > bribe and found guilty for, et cetera et cetera.And tell me if there was > political inteference when Zuma was financially dependent on Shaik for > over ten years. Can't help but imagine how many people were disturbed by > that pronouncement. While other opposition parties in their campaigns > are using Zuma's corruption sagga to boost their chances,Mr' Plaatjie's > PAM decide to do the opposite, amidst zero chances to be recognised in > these elections. Wonder what is in for him or his party..For it was > clearly political chicanery,opportunism and expediency at its worst > form. > > Umhlaba > > > > All Email originating from UWC is covered by disclaimer > http://www.uwc.ac.za/portal/public/portal_services/disclaimer.htm > ------------------------------------------- South Africas premier free email service - www.webmail.co.za ------------------------------------------------------------------ For super low premiums, click here http://home.webmail.co.za/dd.pwm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Groups "Pan Africanist Youth Congress of Azania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/payco Visit our website at www.geocities.com/paycoonline //panafricanist.blogspot.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
