Chris, I wasn't even suggesting that the local lending library would
allow you to make copies of any of their material, of course they would
not and should not. My point was that local lending libraries make
material available to the public that is just as easily pirated as BARD
but they don't shoehorn patrons into supporting the for profit business
of mandatory players. That would be like going to my local lending
library and checking out a book and have them tell me that I can only
read it while sitting in a a LazyBoy Recliner, not another brand. But,
of course if I can't afford it, us as tax payers, would be glad to fit
the bill for that LazyBoy.


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christopher Chaltain
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:24 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: It's Still Stealing

No, but the library won't let you make copies of that book and give them

away or sell them to others. The copy protection scheme with BARD books 
is intended to keep these books from getting into the general public and

impacting the sales of audio books. This kind of protection is necessary

in order to ensure cooperation with the publishers. I think the attitude

of some on this list that once they have an MP3 in their possession 
they're able to do with it whatever they want demonstrates why the NLS 
and other companies and agencies need to take such action.

Although I'm sure the vendor manufacturing the players is doing it for a

profit, I'm not sure how you know they're making tons of money (whatever

that means). I also have no ideas what insentives you're talking about. 
If you're implying that kickbacks are involved then that's illegal and 
you should report that. I also don't see how the 3rd party players are 
raking in the dough from this, unless by providing this feature they're 
boosting their sales. I don't see anything wrong with that by the way.


Christopher
[email protected]


On 4/19/2010 8:10 AM, Frank Ventura wrote:
> If I walk into my local public library and check out a book the
> librarian doesn't tell me which room in my house I can or cannot read
> the book in. However with BARD they restrict qualified persons as to
> which player the must use. The government is buying tons of those new
> digital players and someone is making tons of money building and
selling
> them to the government and someone in said government is receiving
> "incentives" to continue this practice? So does anyone not think it is
> all about money?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James Homuth
> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 12:01 PM
> To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
> Subject: RE: It's Still Stealing
>
> BARD is under the misguided impression that, even after you download
> your
> copy of a particular book, BARD still owns that copy. You have no
legal
> authority to do anything, considered legal or otherwise, with that
copy.
> Not
> only is that incorrect, but it's also even more restrictive than even
> the
> most literally interpreted copyright law. Again, I'll use my example
of
> iTunes. You pay for a couple songs from iTunjes. They're now yours.
> Apple no
> longer owns those copies. You can put them on your iWhatever, burn
them
> to a
> CD, do pretty much whatever you want with them. Not true with BARD.
And
> it's
> business models like that that convince people to do things you would
> call
> stealing.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Ford Blackwell
> Sent: April 18, 2010 11:51 AM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: It's Still Stealing
>
> but from Bard, which was your example, you don't have permission.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "mitchell"<[email protected]>
> To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'"<[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 10:43 AM
> Subject: RE: It's Still Stealing
>
>
>    
>> That's absulootly rite, but after you qualify for the servis, and
down
>>      
>    
>> load
>> the file you still don't return it so if this all rite then how is
tom
>>      
> or
>    
>> anyone who has someone's pramition to coppy a fyle then how is it
>> steeling?
>> Mitchell
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>>      
> [mailto:[email protected]]
>    
>> On Behalf Of James Homuth
>> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 10:37 AM
>> To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
>> Subject: RE: It's Still Stealing
>>
>> Apple tried to do the exact same thing with their iTunes. They tried
>> limitting exactly what type of player you could put their music etc
on
>>      
> in
>    
>> the same way BARD is. The reasons that didn't work are the exact same
>> reasons BARD shouldn't be doing that either. If you get your hands on
>> something, whether you have legal access to do so or not, you're
going
>>      
> to
>    
>> want to do whatever you want with that something. Either put it on a
>>      
> CD,
>    
>> or
>> copy it to something smaller than your Victor Reader, or any number
of
>> things. And if someone wants to burn that book to a CD, or do
>>      
> something
>    
>> else
>> with it that BARD has decided they're not allowed to, even though
they
>>      
>    
>> have
>> legal access to it, people are just going to find less legal means to
>>      
> do
>    
>> so.
>> Rather than prop up and defend an out of date business model, people
>> should
>> be pushing companies like BARD to get caught up with the rest of the
>>      
> world
>    
>> and actually give people a choice as to what to do with their
>> acquisitions.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>>      
> [mailto:[email protected]]
>    
>> On Behalf Of Ford Blackwell
>> Sent: April 18, 2010 11:28 AM
>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: It's Still Stealing
>>
>> But with Bard, you're not permitted to share and you have to qualify
>>      
> for
>    
>> their service by being blind and having a player that they authroize.
>> There
>> is a specific exception in the copyright law for Bard and Bookshare
>>      
> type
>    
>> services.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "mitchell"<[email protected]>
>> To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'"<[email protected]>
>> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 10:17 AM
>> Subject: RE: It's Still Stealing
>>
>>
>>      
>>> I'm with you man, if it is steeling then why is it all rite to use
>>> bard with the book players, because you are downloading the books.
>>> Then you are not giving them back. Not a problem as far as I am
>>> concerned.
>>> Mitchell
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> On Behalf Of DJ DOCTOR P
>>> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 8:09 AM
>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>>> Subject: Re: It's Still Stealing
>>>
>>> Ok, so you say, "it's still stealing."
>>> Then you tell me, why are there still some websites that lets you
>>> download music and audio books without having to pay anything for
it?
>>> Yes these sites still exist, and people are downloading music and
>>> audio books without having to pay a dime for it.
>>> Explain that one to me, if you can!
>>>   John.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Tom"<[email protected]>
>>> To:<[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 6:49 AM
>>> Subject: It's Still Stealing
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>>> It's still stealing whether or not your boss gives you permission
to
>>>> copy it.
>>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>> ** Message From: DJ DOCTOR P **
>>>>          
>>>>> High Tom,
>>>>> I don't do it unless my boss gives me the green light to
>>>>>            
>>>> do it.
>>>>          
>>>>> If he says yes, then I do it.
>>>>> But if he says no, then it doesn't happen.
>>>>>            
>

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[email protected]

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[email protected]

Reply via email to