At 11:10 PM 2/7/03 -0800, Harold B wrote (in part) the following:

I've seen this suggestion re email ... "Do NOT type your reply at the
end of the original email. I know it sounds logical, but the recipient
has to scroll down to the bottom to read it. And he can't read your
message in his preview panel." I've also read (I think it was right here
in PCWorks), that it is best to configure the email to have the response
at the bottom of the thread. Are there any thoughts on this dilemma?
Once upon a time before MS ever existed ALL e-mail and messaging systems
used bottom posting. It's a historical thing! Here is a rough timeline of
some important dates concerning messaging, e-mail, and the Internet.

1971 - First ARPANET e-mail message sent by Ray Tomlinson

1978 - Ward Christensen writes the first BBS system software. First form of
messaging for PCs. All replies to messages were added to the bottom. I
started using BBSs in 1979.

1979 - USENET established using UUCP between Duke University and University
of North Carolina. Usenet still relies heavily today on newsreaders that
apply bottom posting.

1981 - Release of IBM PROFS word processing system for VM. First word
processing and e-mail message system for mainframes. Relied heavily on
bottom posting.

1982 - The term "Internet" is coined.

1983 - ">" added to show material that is quoted. USENET newreaders.

1985 - LISTERV mailing list work started for BITNET academic network. The
first version of this Revised LISTSERV was released in June 1986 for IBM
mainframes runing VM. The first versions of LISTSERV for UNIX and VMS were
released in June 1994. Because this mailing list program originated on IBM
mainframes, bottom posting was the standard. This is where I learned my
Internet mailing list etiquette.

1985 - Quantum Qlink dialup launched for Commodore PCs. Forerunner of AOL.

1988 - Eudora, first written by Steve Dorner, an employee at the University
of Illinois. Eudora 1.0 was released in May of 1990. The is my first
Internet e-mail GUI client program. The original versions all used bottom
posting.

1989 - Pine was originally conceived as a simple, easy-to-use mailer for
administrative staff at the University of Washington in Seattle. Used Elm
(another bottom posting e-mail program) as the starting point because the
code was freely available.  Pine 1.0.3 released April 17, 1991. This is my
first UNIX shell account mail program which I still use. It originally was
configured as a bottom posting mail program.

1989 - IBM introduces the Office Vision system for VM, VMS, MVS. This is the
standard e-mail/calendaring/messaging system for IBM mainframes. I was the
system administrator for our company's e-mail system. I also taught this
system to new employees. This also was designed as a bottom poster.

1991 - DOS version of AOL launched.

1993 - first version of PC-Pine (3.84) released in July. I used this with my
shell account via SLiRP. This version was also a bottom poster.

1993 - Mosaic, the first graphics-based Web browser developed at the
National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded National Center for Supercomputing
Applications (NCSA) University of Illinois, is released.

1994 - Netscape Communications Corp. is formed.

1995 - MS delivers first version of IE and Internet standards are forever
tossed by the wayside in favor of MS developed "standards".

Bottom posting is the oldest established method of replying to e-mail or
USENET postings on the Internet. It is also the oldest method used in
general use in replying on any messaging system.

IMHO it is also the most logical as it shows that the sender is in a
dialogue with the recipient or other posters. It makes it easy for new
subscribers to a mailing list to follow a conversational thread. It's just
logical.



--
Gerry Boyd
============= PCWorks Mailing List =================
Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines &
make sure you've followed proper posting procedures,
http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm
Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com
=====================================================

Reply via email to