> > i am all for it, but: does sourceforge already implement some kind of > > acl for svn? or can we live without acl's? > > According to the Site Docs, "no means is provided to limit access to a > repository on a per-path basis" for Subversion. This seems to be > planned, but as we know Sourceforge, one shouldn't hold his/her > breath.
well, the pd repository doesn't need to be located at sourceforge ... i mean, the plone site is located on an iem server, so, if someone takes the work of converting a cvs repository to a subversion, why not move the repository server? currently two features of sf are used ... the cvs and the tracker ... imo, it wouldn't be a bad idea, to put the svn server as well as a decent bug tracker (bugzilla/mantis/whatever) onto the puredata.info server and abandon sourceforge ... not sure, if the iem / the puredata.info server has enough resources, but at least no one would complain about sourceforge any more :) tim -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 96771783 http://www.mokabar.tk You can play a shoestring if you're sincere John Coltrane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
