Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > Frank Barknecht wrote: > > > 1) developer vote: > > > > Should the SF repository switch from CVS to SVN on Sourceforge? > > [ ] yes > > [ ] no > > i am all for it, but: does sourceforge already implement some kind of > acl for svn? or can we live without acl's?
Uh, we need to check this. But AFAIK we currently only use the ACL on Miller's branch. > > 2) sort out techical issues with branches, tags etc. > > for externals i would suggest to split branches on each external > separately, (e.g. /externals/zexy/trunk instead of /trunk/externals/zexy > or /externals/trunk/zexy) Yes, I agree with this, but this can be dealt with after The Big Change, I suppose. For the externals we also should to take care not to break the extended Build-system. Some changes will be necessary to the Build of course, because of the usual trunk/tags/branches layout in SVN. I cannot really comment on how to best deal with the branches of Pd's sources. > > 3) find someone (incl. admins!) who volunteers to do the import. I > > would volunteer but I wouldn't want to do this completely alone. > > i would volunteer too, however i don't see any advantage in having 2 (or > more) persons involved in the migration. (probably when they are at the > same terminal, like with XP, then there might be a benefit) Let's do it mid-September then, when I'm in Graz. ;) I would actually prefer if someone else than me would do it, as I'm not that experienced especially with CVS internals, so I would gladly let you take over. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__ _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
