Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > 1) developer vote: > > Should the SF repository switch from CVS to SVN on Sourceforge? > [ ] yes > [ ] no
i am all for it, but: does sourceforge already implement some kind of acl for svn? or can we live without acl's? > > 2) sort out techical issues with branches, tags etc. for externals i would suggest to split branches on each external separately, (e.g. /externals/zexy/trunk instead of /trunk/externals/zexy or /externals/trunk/zexy) (the repository basically consists of a lot of small packages which all have their independent release cycles) for pd/pd-devel i suggest 2 main branches in parallel (e.g. /pd/trunk/ and /pd/devel/ instead of /pd/branches/devel > 3) find someone (incl. admins!) who volunteers to do the import. I > would volunteer but I wouldn't want to do this completely alone. i would volunteer too, however i don't see any advantage in having 2 (or more) persons involved in the migration. (probably when they are at the same terminal, like with XP, then there might be a benefit) mfg.adsr- .IOhannes > > 4) agree on date > > 5) do it. > > Ciao _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
