Tim Blechmann wrote: >>> i am all for it, but: does sourceforge already implement some kind of >>> acl for svn? or can we live without acl's? >> According to the Site Docs, "no means is provided to limit access to a >> repository on a per-path basis" for Subversion. This seems to be >> planned, but as we know Sourceforge, one shouldn't hold his/her >> breath. > > well, the pd repository doesn't need to be located at sourceforge ... i > mean, the plone site is located on an iem server, so, if someone takes > the work of converting a cvs repository to a subversion, why not move > the repository server? > currently two features of sf are used ... the cvs and the tracker ... > imo, it wouldn't be a bad idea, to put the svn server as well as a > decent bug tracker (bugzilla/mantis/whatever) onto the puredata.info > server and abandon sourceforge ... > not sure, if the iem / the puredata.info server has enough resources, > but at least no one would complain about sourceforge any more :) >
they biggest problem i see is the user migration. unfortunately, all the puredata.info users are currently stored within the zope-db; it they were stored in an ldap-server, the user credentials could be used for cvs/svn/git/... authentication. i currently don't know how to migrate the users from zodb to ldap. mf.asdr. IOhannes _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
