On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Plans Casal David wrote:
On 14 Dec 2006, at 18:18, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I propose moving the IEM GUI objects that are embedded in Pd into the
"extra" folder, compiled as individual files.
What's the advantage of doing that?
Separation of Concerns:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_concerns
Separation of language, content, and presentation has to be a good move, no?
but the IEMGUIs, like the rest of the Pd GUIs, are part of the language.
You can't remove them without breaking the code. If they were just
presentation, you could slice them away and the patch would run the same.
If you want to separate concerns, what you want to slice away is the
t_widgetbehavior section of each of Pd's GUI classes (including
that of objectboxes, messageboxes, floatboxes, symbolboxes, patchers,
arrays, ...).
The only project that slices away t_widgetbehavior, and thus separate Pd's
presentation from Pd's language/content, is called DesireData. The feature
doesn't have much to do with namespacing and classloaders: if you want
another reimplementation of Pd's GUI that does separation of concerns, you
will spend 1% of the effort on getting the thing to load in place of the
original classes, and 99% on making sure that it works like the original
classes.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
PD-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
