On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 16, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Plans Casal David wrote:
Separation of Concerns:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_concerns
Separation of language, content, and presentation has to be a good move,
no?
but the IEMGUIs, like the rest of the Pd GUIs, are part of the language.
You can't remove them without breaking the code.
I have a working version of Pd with the iemguis as externals, so I don't
see the "breaking the code" part,
That's not relevant, because we're talking about what it means to separate
concerns. I'm trying to make a point about what it means to separate
presentation, and how it is that separating IEMGUI does not constitute
separating presentation, and I use the removal of IEMGUI as an example,
and then you come in and say that you are not removing IEMGUI. What are
you talking about? What am *I* talking about?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
