I do not see how I could have more than one buffer at the same time if it were declared statically. The data has to be 'findable', so I need some way to name it. pd_findbyclass() seems to be the right tool for this, though I am still trying to figure out how to create the t_class that will have the sms data.
I think, after looking into the various possibilities, outputting a pointer to the data would just be confusing and might not work when sent through pd's messaging system. It appears that keeping the buffer by a symbol name would be cleaner. On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Thomas Grill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Data sharing in pool is no flext-specific feature... you can do that with > any external by making the shared data "static" (in c-style9, as opposed to > be allocated with the object instances. > gr~~~ > > How do you manage to keep multiple pool's then? regards, Richie
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
