Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Quoting Mathieu Bouchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> How do you get [print] to print a peachy string? >> in the way we (including miller) kind of agreed at LAC2008 the answer >> is simple: you don't. > > Perhaps you don't, but I do print my A_LIST atoms right fucking now > using an object called [print], in Miller's Pd, instead of agreeing with > things that can either crash pd or make it do something undefined that > has nothing to do with printing the contents of the string.
so how do you fookin' do it? > > All this resignation must be bringing you closer to God... yes. > > Yeah, well, I agree with your type registry idea, and I shall remember > not to go to anything like LAC for the number of pd developers. It's a > kind of reflex that I have to fight. I would have to go to LAC for any i think this is a good decision; if you do want to talk about Pd then you should go to Pd~con or ICMC or another computer-music oriented meeting. LAC used to be a lot about soundcard drivers and new tools/applications, none of which is a category Pd really falls into; i had the impression that a lot of old-school LACers where a bit overwhelmed (and probably frustrated) by the LAC2008 because of the focus on Pd (but then i was a bit frustrated by the focus on SC3 at LAC2007, esp. as many presentations were done on os-x with a remark "ah, this doesn't yet work on linux"); LAC2008 was still great (but i am not an ol-skool LACer) mfga.sdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev