Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: >> actually matteo just wanted to point out that he has already submitted a >> bug-report to the bug-tracker [1817858] > >> i think he only wanted to raise the priority on a social level. > > > If I didn't wait even 45 minutes (nor even 5 probably) after reporting the > bug before I wrote to the ml, it was not for impatience but just because the
oh sorry, i was not aware of that. to me it seemed that between your posting to the tracker and to the ml a timespan of 4 hours elapsed. (the tracker-item was created at 14:42 to which is responded at 15:23, my mailclient (thunderbird) shows the _sending_ date for your email as 18:06CEST) i admit i haven't fully checked whether your email was stuck in some greylisting/... and therefore whether it was actually sent at about the same time.... > two messages were intended for different targets: just like one may post a > question to two (or more) different forum all related to the topic of his > question. > I didn't even expect any quick workaround or "hack" to be posted to the > tracker. darn, i am too fast... > > Thank you very much IOhannes for the fix you posted, however I'm afraid I > can't try it out. > Correct me if I'm wrong: I need to recompile PD after modifying the source > code with the patch, right? wrong. you just need to edit the pd.tk file which is read and interpreted at runtime by the tcl/tk-interpreter (wish on w32) the only thing you have to do is restart pd... > I don't have the skills to do that right now, sorry. it is very simple: download the patch and open it with a decent text-editor (notepad might have problems with the carriage returns) any line prefixed with a "-" is to be removed from the original source, and line prefixed with a "+" is to be added. the lines without prefixes are there to give you a context (e.g. if you have already applied another patch (e.g. because you are not using pd-vanilla's pd.tk) the line-numbers might differ, but the context will hopefully be the same) what you basically have to do is change the 2 occurences of "-%D/abs(%D)" to "(%D>0)?:-1:1" (or something like this, i don't remember exactly) > Btw, I am using Windows version of PD (vanilla 0.40.2), sorry I didn't > mention it in the report (i usually do, it was an oversight). no big problem; i imagined something like this :-) the problem can only occur on w32 and os-x (linux/freebsd uses different code here that cannot divide by zero) mfga.dr IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
