On Jun 2, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Steffen Juul wrote: > > On 02/06/2008, at 9.48, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >> finally i have decided to release Gem-0.91 codename 'tigital'. > > Cool, thanks. > > I just made (with bash+) a pd-patch that instantiate all the object- > classes that have a help-patch in the Gem folder. It's attached in > case others might find it useful for testing or just for the > overview or something else.
Looks useful. That reminds me of my small effort along these lines: http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data/trunk/scripts/ load_every_help.sh http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data/trunk/scripts/ load_every_object.sh I like to set these up to run every night, but I don't think I can handle the extra load of fixing the broken help files in finds on top what I am already trying to manage. So I want to know if anyone is interested in following up on whenever this script finds a missing help file. Basically, it would entail just checking why it failed. It could be a help file that causes a crash or a missing helpfile. In the case of a missing help file, for example, it would just be a matter of making a helpfile and submitting it to the patch tracker (or committing it if you have commit access). .hc > > Best > > <gem_obj_list.pd>_______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ¡El pueblo unido jamás será vencido! _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
