On 03/06/2008, at 20.48, Steffen Juul wrote: > > On 02/06/2008, at 14.25, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >> if you (or anybody else) finds more bugs till tomorrow > > Has something happened to [pix_data] since > GEM: ver: 0.91-cvs > GEM: compiled: May 21 2008 > ? (I can't see anything in the Changelog.) > > I have a patch that uses that where the output is very different > between the two versions.
Maybe i should add that there is also a [pix_contrast] involved. The chain all in all is: [gemhead] [pix_image] [pix_contrast] [pix_texture] [square] [pix_data] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
