Le 3 juin 08 à 21:36, Steffen Juul a écrit : > > On 03/06/2008, at 20.48, Steffen Juul wrote: > >> >> On 02/06/2008, at 14.25, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >> >>> if you (or anybody else) finds more bugs till tomorrow >> >> Has something happened to [pix_data] since >> GEM: ver: 0.91-cvs >> GEM: compiled: May 21 2008 >> ? (I can't see anything in the Changelog.) >> >> I have a patch that uses that where the output is very different >> between the two versions. Have you screenshots before/after ? > > Maybe i should add that there is also a [pix_contrast] involved. The > chain all in all is: > > [gemhead] > [pix_image] > [pix_contrast] > [pix_texture] > [square] > [pix_data] No problem, with this chain on MacOSX.4.11, Powerbook G4, Pd version 0.40.3-extended-20080601, GEM: ver: 0.91.0 'tigital' compiled: Jun 1 2008 ++
Jack > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
