--- On Thu, 9/10/09, Si Mills <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Si Mills <[email protected]> > Subject: [PD] Array Enhancements > To: "puredata mailing list" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, September 10, 2009, 11:14 AM > Hi Hans/DEv Tem > I have a couple of ideas for the Array/Table > object, mainly visual: > Hide Array name - > doesn't seem to be working.Would it be possible > to limit the array vertically? This would make manually > entering values for a sequencer more usable.Allow a > step value for each slider, so selecting increments is > easier - I guess an Array in Pd is a array of > multi-sliders in a senseExpand appearance - the > array indexes could be solid barsEvent listeners - > so onMouseUp over an array could trigger > somethingColour > properties!.... You can get all of the above (except onMouseUp behavior) using data structures. Really, there should just be a way to "deputize" a ds array as a Pd array usable by [tabread] and the like. So if you have a subpatch with [struct blah float x array some_array] you could put the following in the same subpatch: [deputize some_array] And now [tabwrite~ some_array] will work. But I don't know the inner workings of Pd either, so I'm not sure how feasible this is. -Jonathan > I know this is probably flawed for I know not > the inner technical workings of Pd, or for its purposes, > there are other more suitable methods for gui interaction, > but is any of this possible? > cheers > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] > mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
