--- On Sat, 9/19/09, Mathieu Bouchard <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PD] Array Enhancements > To: "Jonathan Wilkes" <[email protected]> > Cc: "puredata mailing list" <[email protected]>, "Si Mills" <[email protected]> > Date: Saturday, September 19, 2009, 10:44 PM > On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Jonathan Wilkes > wrote: > > > Do you mean a struct having *arrays* x, y, and z > like: > > [struct foo array x x-element array y y-element array > z z-element] > > ? > > No, sorry, just [struct foo float x float y float z] used > as the template of an array. I thought that we were talking > about that... > > > Then [tabwrite~ foo] writes to all arrays in foo, and > [tabwrite~ bar] writes to array y of foo if you use > [virtualarray foo bar y]. Do I have it right, or am I > completely misunderstanding? > > I mean that with the struct foo above, and an array named > foo using struct foo as its template, you could make a > virtual array named bar, which would be an actual subpart of > the array foo, using a different template, which would have > to be some kind of substruct of the original template. Oh, I see. So how would you get an array named foo to use struct foo as its template, as opposed to the hidden float struct? > > >> I know this is probably flawed for I know not the > inner technical workings of Pd, or for its purposes, there > are other more suitable methods for gui interaction, but is > any of this possible? cheers > > I don't believe I wrote this. > > why do you say that? Because it doesn't have the name of the author above it (Si Mills) so it looks like you're responding to me. -Jonathan > > _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ > _____________________ ... > | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: > +1.514.383.3801 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
