----- Original Message -----
> From: IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 5:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [PD] weird behavior with dynamically created abstractions (sound
> doesn't work)
>
> On 11/19/2012 11:18 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>>> I've never seen an external in svn where [abstraction1] would rely
> on an
>>> internal [loadbang] in order to send a message to its outlet.
>>
>> well, very few *externals* (as in "atomic" (non-openable) objects
>> written mostly in C) do anything with loadbangs.
>>
>
> and those that do, usually do create output on [loadbang].
> e.g. iemguis (both externals and internals), or iemlib's [init] (i know
> iem-stuff better than other externals, hence the bias in the enumeration).
>
> so those will definitely break your patches.
_If_ you dynamically instantiate them with all their arguments and with the
init flag on. That's quite an edge case.
-Jonathan
>
>
> fgmdasr
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
