Hi Jim, just a quick reply: Perhaps pix_buffer is what you could use here? I see no need for two instances.
* Jim Ruxton <[email protected]> [2017-12-08 18:51]: > I want to use Gem to capture still frames from a video stream. I was going > to use pix_write . At the same time I want to turn those still frames into a > movie and output them in a Gem window. Since pix_write captures the rendered > output I assume I need 1 PD instance for the capture and 1 PD instance for > the output. Related to this should I use pix_multiimage to output the > frames or use a script to continually create a movie then use pix_film? In > other words the output movie will continuously get longer as frames are > captured from the video stream. I know I will need to allow time for > loading, saving etc. > > Thanks for any advice before I tackle this. I am using Linux. > > Jim > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
