* IOhannes m zmoelnig <[email protected]> [2017-12-11 12:05]: > On 2017-12-11 10:19, Peter P. wrote: > > * IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]> [2017-12-10 18:56]: > >> On 12/10/2017 04:40 PM, Peter P. wrote: > >>>> [pix_snap] + [pix_buffer] + [makefilename] > >>> So [pix_write] cound become an abstraction that holds the above objects > >>> maybe. > >>> > >> > >> patches/PRs welcome. > > Just curious, if [pix_write] would become an abstraction as described > > avove how would one do the encoding of still images saved from > > [pix_buffer] into a (compressed) video file without using external tools > > (ffmpeg, mencoder) then? > > price question: how would you do that with [pix_write] as a binary (as > is now)? Sorry, mixed it up with [pix_record].
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
