Thanks a lot Peter pix_buffer works great for this. I'd like to find a
way to retrieve everything if I lose power but I think I can do that by
also pix_writing every frame.
Jim
On 2017-12-08 02:51 PM, Peter P. wrote:
Hi Jim,
just a quick reply: Perhaps pix_buffer is what you could use here?
I see no need for two instances.
* Jim Ruxton <[email protected]> [2017-12-08 18:51]:
I want to use Gem to capture still frames from a video stream. I was going
to use pix_write . At the same time I want to turn those still frames into a
movie and output them in a Gem window. Since pix_write captures the rendered
output I assume I need 1 PD instance for the capture and 1 PD instance for
the output. Related to this should I use pix_multiimage to output the
frames or use a script to continually create a movie then use pix_film? In
other words the output movie will continuously get longer as frames are
captured from the video stream. I know I will need to allow time for
loading, saving etc.
Thanks for any advice before I tackle this. I am using Linux.
Jim
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
