On 2017-12-11 10:19, Peter P. wrote: > * IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]> [2017-12-10 18:56]: >> On 12/10/2017 04:40 PM, Peter P. wrote: >>>> [pix_snap] + [pix_buffer] + [makefilename] >>> So [pix_write] cound become an abstraction that holds the above objects >>> maybe. >>> >> >> patches/PRs welcome. > Just curious, if [pix_write] would become an abstraction as described > avove how would one do the encoding of still images saved from > [pix_buffer] into a (compressed) video file without using external tools > (ffmpeg, mencoder) then?
price question: how would you do that with [pix_write] as a binary (as is now)? fgamsdr IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
