Chris Brogden wrote: > > I'm still waiting for a GLC (Grumpy Lens Curmudgeon) to jump in and remind > us that all we *really* need is an old Spotmatic with the 55/1.8... and > even that newfangled "meter thing" should be viewed with a little > suspicion. That's Shel's job, but he's busy sorting through 50,000 negs, so he'll be busy for a while. Anyway he's wrong, you're not really a complete photographer until you get that next lens. Well, maybe the one after.... tv - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech Prec... John Glover
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech Precisio... Chris Brogden
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech Prec... John Glover
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech Prec... Mark Roberts
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech ... John Glover
- Re: Too Many Lenses (Was; Plastic Crap Lenses... dosk
- Re: Too Many Lenses (Was; Plastic Crap Le... John Glover
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech Precision? canislupus
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech Precision? Mike Johnston
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech Precision? Chris Brogden
- Ask and thou shalt receive! tom
- Ask and thou shalt receive! Ted Bradshaw
- Re: Ask and thou shalt receive! Chris Brogden
- Re: Ask and thou shalt receive! Bill D. Casselberry
- Re: Ask and thou shalt receive! PAUL STENQUIST
- Re: Ask and thou shalt receive! bc
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech Precision? Mike Johnston
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech Precision? Bojidar Dimitrov
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech Precision? John Glover

