[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I reread his post. He says: "and I shoot colour neg for scanning with a view > to producing inkjet prints on watercolour paper, once the technology has > matured a little more." > > That reads as if he wants or intends to output to inkjet, ~not~ chemical > processing, for his final output. Weren't you quoting prices for 4x5 scanning backs and so on in your large format digital vs. small format digital reply? Perhaps I misread your response. :) -Aaron - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with ... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Porta 160... SudaMafud
- Re: Re[2]: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Po... SudaMafud
- Re[4]: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with P... Colin & Linda McKie
- Re: Re[4]: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Po... SudaMafud
- Re[6]: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with P... Colin & Linda McKie
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Port... William Robb
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Porta 160... Collin Brendemuehl
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Porta 160... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Porta 160... SudaMafud
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Port... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Porta 160... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Port... William Robb
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with ... Aaron Reynolds

