Re[6]: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Porta 160)

[Colin & Linda McKie]

Mafud wrote:
> I ~certainly~ won't argue with your right to believe in ~small format~
> digital or its possibilities. I will caution you that neither of us can 
> afford "real digital" imaging, that is: medium and 4 x 5 formats which are 
> producing amazing photographs right now, ~today~.

Whoa there! Who says I believe in ~small format~ digital? I'm talking
about film, shot in a Pentax 67 (gotta keep on-topic :-)), as source
material. Colour neg is fine as a starting point, it's the print that
I can't bear.

I'm well aware that affordable digital capture is nowhere near good
enough yet. Digital output is, in my opinion, a long way ahead of
conventional colour print material already and will improve greatly
in the near future.

Colin


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .