Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Porta 160)

[William Robb]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: February 21, 2001 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Porta 160)


>
> Interesting.  Quite obviously you've misread the post you are
replying
> to, Mafud.  He's talking about scanning a neg and printing it,
in which
> case capabilities for 11x14s with a long archival life will
run you
> $15,000 if you splurge, and capabilities for archival 24x36
will cost
> you just over $20,000.  If you'd like, I can break down those
numbers
> for you into specifics.

Not misread. He is starting his games of misrepresenataion,
misquoting and missing the point all over again.
The guy is a Kodak cheerleader, and equates everything digital
to some piece of crap he saw years ago.
You will never get him to learn anything new.
All that will happen is we will see another round of flame wars,
which I am not going to participate in.
L8R
William Robb

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .