----- Original Message -----
From: Dr E D F Williams
Subject: Re: A new DSLR standard emerging?


> Why just these two? Why not all that you can find and then
make an qualified
> assessment of the data you've gathered? But as I said before.
This is a
> red-herring and secondary to my main theses which is/was 'you
don't need a
> piece of film much bigger than your image'.
>
> Don
>
> But I'm tired of this. I don't need to go on banging my head
on a wall
> because one or two people can't read simple English.

Actually, Don, that was in direct response to your post claiming
that 35mm lenses are better than medium format lenses. The
reason I am not seeking out more information is because you seem
to have closed your mind, and I can't be bothered with trying to
pry it open.

William Robb
>
> D
>
> Dr E D F Williams
>
> http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
> Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
> Updated: March 30, 2002
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 5:48 PM
> Subject: Re: A new DSLR standard emerging?
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Dr E D F Williams
> > Subject: Re: A new DSLR standard emerging?
> >
> >
> > > All you have to do is take a look at the published MTFs
for 35
> > mm lenses and
> > > compare them with those for Medium Format to see what you
say
> > is not true.
> > > Lenses for 35 mm are always much better corrected because
they
> > have to do
> > > more exacting work.
> >
> > Please see:
> > http://www.hevanet.com/cperez/MF_testing.html
> > for some medium format lens tests.
> > Pay particular attention to the 80mm Zeiss Planar lens.
> >
> > Now, go to:
> > http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/resolutn.htm
> > And compare the Zeiss Planar numbers to any of the Pentax
50mm
> > lens numbers.
> >
> > Get back to me after you have checked it out.
> >
> > William Robb
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to