Juey, I don't think you have thought that through. A scan of a print vs. the orginial file would load the images in favor of the digital. Scans of both prints would load the images in favor of the 6x7 because the digital print is halftoned and halftoned prints do not scan well. You really need to do them yourself so you have a first genration print for both.
In another vein, both are adequate for money making photography so it does not matter as much as most people would think. On the other hand, if you are doing fine art photography film is still the way to go. Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto ----- Original Message ----- From: "Juey Chong Ong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 10:27 AM Subject: Re: 14mp IS NOT 6x7 Quality > > On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 09:16 AM, T Rittenhouse wrote: > > > Unfortunately a scan of my prints on the net would lose so much > > quality that > > you could tell nothing about them, so you will have to do your own > > comparison if you don't trust mine. > > Tom, > > I don't think a image on the net would lose quality if you posted it in > the same sizes that the Kodak DCS14n samples are posted as. (i.e. > 36.9MB TIFF, 3.1MB JPEG or 1.5MB JPEG) > > But I think a more useful comparison would be a same subject, same > lighting, same exposure comparison. > > --jc >
