> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >That's really twisting his meaning. How many 645 owners > out there go > >out of their way to purchase a 67 lens specifically to use on their > >645? I gotta believe it is low. The only time I've heard > of anyone > >doing that is if they have both cameras. > > Actually, I'm considering doing just that myself. I'm > thinking of the 67 > 165mm f2.8 for my 645. (I've heard people say they don't > like the 645 > 150/2.8, which is the closest 645 lens)
Wierd, I think this is the greatest short tele of all time. tv
