The 150/2.8 for the 645 is a very very nice lens, probaly one of my favourites from pentax.
The 150/3.5 on the other hand, leaves a bit to be desired. Regards, Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 9:50 AM Subject: RE: Seeking advise on medium format > > -----Original Message----- > > From: P�l Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Mark wrote: > > > > > Actually, I'm considering doing just that myself. I'm > > thinking of the 67 > > > 165mm f2.8 for my 645. (I've heard people say they don't > > like the 645 > > > 150/2.8, which is the closest 645 lens) > > > > Why? I've heard that the 165/2.8 is not the best among the > > Pentax 67 lenses whereas the 150/2.8 for the 645 is > > supposedly stellar. > > Yeah, I was just going through some prints to bring to the PDML > meeting tonight, and I have a headshot of Cesar I took when I borrowed > one at GFM. You can his skin in excruciating detail. > > Frankly, it's disgusting. > > tv > > >
