Mark, Are there any other lenses in 67 that are not available in 645 or that are real dogs in 645?
I have both 165's and have debated with myself many times as to whether to sell the 2.8 because of the need of the leaf shutter. But that extra stop is always handy to have and the lens does have very nice bokeh. Bruce Monday, February 24, 2003, 1:50:40 PM, you wrote: MR> Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>That's really twisting his meaning. How many 645 owners out there go >>out of their way to purchase a 67 lens specifically to use on their >>645? I gotta believe it is low. The only time I've heard of anyone >>doing that is if they have both cameras. MR> Actually, I'm considering doing just that myself. I'm thinking of the 67 MR> 165mm f2.8 for my 645. (I've heard people say they don't like the 645 MR> 150/2.8, which is the closest 645 lens)
