> -----Original Message-----
> From: P�l Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Mark wrote:
>
> > Actually, I'm considering doing just that myself. I'm
> thinking of the 67
> > 165mm f2.8 for my 645. (I've heard people say they don't
> like the 645
> > 150/2.8, which is the closest 645 lens)
>
> Why? I've heard that the 165/2.8 is not the best among the
> Pentax 67 lenses whereas the 150/2.8 for the 645 is
> supposedly stellar.

Yeah, I was just going through some prints to bring to the PDML
meeting tonight, and I have a headshot of Cesar I took when I borrowed
one at GFM. You can his skin in excruciating detail.

Frankly, it's disgusting.

tv



Reply via email to