The standard recommendation in photo books is to underexpose slides slightly. No meter is perfect and it seems like it's harder to understand multisegment metering than centreweighted metering. Centerweighted metering tries to expose everything as medium grey and with centreweighted metering, the photographer has to overexpose in bright and sunny situations, like snow pictures for example. Years ago, many compact cameras had a "+1.5" button for snow pictures and when shooting into-the-un. Multisegment metering is like centreweighted metering which automatically activates the "+1.5 button" for high contrast situations, to keep the highlights as highlights. So that white comes out as white and not as medium grey.

I like this, I'm very impressed by this. It is of course not perfect, but it's closer to how the scene really looks like than what centreweighted metering can achieve.

Photography is all about *learning the metering system*, and to learn when to compensate. I have no problems with that. I had to learn with centreweighted metering, and with multisegment I have to learn again. But I use exposure compensation much less with multisegment metering than with centreweighted metering. And when I use it, I use lower values (+/- 0.5 EV) with multisegment than I use with centreweighted metering (+/- 1-2 EV). So, multisegment metering is much closer to the reality.

Best wishes,
Roland

From: Alin Flaider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:42:19 +0200

   Well, you may like lighter transparencies. I myself, prefer denser
   slides with details both in highlights and shadows. BTW, I used to
   shoot CTPrecisa as well.


_________________________________________________________________
Skaffa fler messengerkontakter - Vinn 10.000 i resecheckar! http://messenger.msn.se/promo




Reply via email to