I recently picked up both of these lenses, but I don't have enough results back to say much, other than they seem to have the Pentax qualities I was looking for. I haven't really given them a workout, yet, and most of the images from the 24-50 are still in the camera.

I know the F 70-210 is the only non-star (*) F lens to use an ED element, a fact Pentax (as usual) didn't mention in any advertising or product info about the lens. This gives it some performance advantages, from what I've read -- is it significantly better than the A 70-210? A few people seem to like it better than the later FA 70-200 lens.

The 24-50 has the same optical formula as the 24-50 A lens, which I believe was an improvement over the 24-50 M lens that didn't get great performance reviews.

Joe

Try looking here for information on the F 70-210. Seems not many people have used the 24-50mm though.

http://www.concentric.net/~smhalpin/



At 10:22 AM 4/3/2003 -0800, you wrote:
I need some help. Most of the time I use prime lenses and are very happy with them but sometimes I need a zoom or two when family is involved.
Currently I'm using the Tamron kit zooms I got when I bought my ZX-30, but the F 24-50mm f4.0 and the F 70-210mm f4.0-5.6 have caught my attention. Here is where you come in, what are the general opinion about these lenses (I know the 70-210mm is pretty good) and what are the going rate for these lense?


Any help is greatly appreciated
Paul

By the way, I did the usual searches but not a lot came up.




_________________________________________________________________ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. --Groucho Marx




Reply via email to