What's not to like about the A 24-50/4?

Lukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
I have a MX and a MZ-S, and consider the latter to be an "AF MX". Sure the
viewfinder isn't that big, but it's mighty contrasty, and a joy to look
through. It's very well built, easy to operate, compact, has about
everything a MX user would want and more, is fully compatibile (I have 6
lenses now - K 50/1.4, FA 50/1.4, Revuenon 55/1.2, FA 28/2.8, M 100/2.8 and
A 24-50/4 [though I'm planning to sell the last one] and with all of them I
can use centerweighed and spot metering, I don't mind not being able to use
matrix metering with the M and K lenses). I'm sure you wouldn't like neither
the MZ-3 nor MZ-5n, because of their viewfinders and plastic construction,
and I'm scared by the multitude of LX glitches (spelling?). I guess a PZ-1/p
could be a cheaper alternative to the MZ-S, if you don't mind more plastic
and a bigger body.



Reply via email to