That is a question I too would like an answer to. The remains of the old
stuff looks thinner, but who knows for sure. The Service manual I downloaded
from Mark Robert's site does not say, so I can only go by comparison. It
would make sense that they were the same, but as I said the remains look
thinner. It would also make sense that the mirror is supposed to hit the
bumper first.

Not much help am I? I have not actually gotten around to replacing the MX's
side and back mirror housing foam yet, as I want to take the camera
completely down and clean all the crap out of it before doing so. The bumper
was so far gone I had to replace it to use the camera at all. Lacking
further information I will use 1mm for the light seals and if that does not
work out I will add a layer (I have had good luck stacking the 1mm strips
for ME Super mirror bumpers).

BTW, the original foam is rather soft, and I do not think using mouse pad
material (as sometimes recommended) for the mirror housing is a good idea, I
have used it for film door light trapping in the past though.

Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto


----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Bevers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: Mirror box foam


> Are the strips on the sides 2mm as well?  Mine were completely gone so
> I had to guess, and I never quite got the right fit.
>
> -Matt
>
>
> On Friday, July 18, 2003, at 07:11 PM, T Rittenhouse wrote:
>
> > ME Super mirror bumper is 3mm, I used three layers of 1 mm form double
> > width
> > (3.5mm) strips.
> >
> > The MX mirror bumper is about 2mm thick and the same width. The MX
> > also has
> > narrower strips (1.75mm) on the sides and back of the top of the
> > mirror box
> > as light seals.
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Graywolf
> > http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Daniel Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >>
> >> Can't go wrong with free stuff. On the other hand, how thick is the
> >> foam used on pentaxes?
> >>
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to