P�l Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I'm afraid I'm not very optimistic regarding the *ist D's fate in the 
>marketplace. There are three fundamental problems with the camera: 
>1) it is not entry level enough to make an impact. By this I mean it is 
>just a "me too" compared to the D10 and the D100 and has no obvious 
>price advantage compared to those. It will face hard competition from 
>forthcoming, cheaper DSLR's. 2) Design. The *istD is ugly with no design
>flair thats going to convince anyone. 

I got to use an *ist-D quite a bit last weekend and I disagree strongly
with both of those points.

-- 
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com

Reply via email to