Tom,
where did that figure $1500 come from?
Hmmm....
Jostein
-----------------------------
Pictures at: http://oksne.net
-----------------------------
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial
Coverage Lenses)


> By the way, you can add Jerome to that list, he was only there one day,
but
> we had to pry the camera from his hands just to try it our selves. His
> comment on the camera was, "I thought this was a free program, but its
going
> to end up costing me $1500".
>
> Ciao,
> Graywolf
> http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:30 PM
> Subject: Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial
> Coverage Lenses)
>
>
> > It makes me happy to see Tom, TV, Bill and Mark so enthusiastic about
the
> > *ist-D.  I've pretty much committed to going 100% digital and seeing the
> > results of the camera in "real-world" use, combined with their praise
> gives
> > me the confidence to buy the camera without a second thought.
> >
> > Christian
> > (ignoring Pal's negativity; personally I think it is a decent looking
> camera
> > with all the features I could hope for)
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:14 PM
> > Subject: RE: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial
> > Coverage Lenses)
> >
> >
> > > Me too.  If Pentax were to spend a bit on marketing the *istD, it
could
> > > be a real winner.  Just the small size and AA battery use give it a
big
> > > advantage, IMNHO.
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
> > >
> > <snip Pal's negativity>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:39 PM
> > Subject: Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial
> > Coverage Lenses)
> >
> >
> > > I agree with Mark.
> > >
> > > Ciao,
> > > Graywolf
> > > http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
> >
> > > I got to use an *ist-D quite a bit last weekend and I disagree
strongly
> > > with both of those points.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mark Roberts
> > > Photography and writing
> > > www.robertstech.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.509 / Virus Database: 306 - Release Date: 8/12/03
>
>
>

Reply via email to