It makes me happy to see Tom, TV, Bill and Mark so enthusiastic about the
*ist-D.  I've pretty much committed to going 100% digital and seeing the
results of the camera in "real-world" use, combined with their praise gives
me the confidence to buy the camera without a second thought.

Christian
(ignoring Pal's negativity; personally I think it is a decent looking camera
with all the features I could hope for)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 1:14 PM
Subject: RE: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial
Coverage Lenses)


> Me too.  If Pentax were to spend a bit on marketing the *istD, it could
> be a real winner.  Just the small size and AA battery use give it a big
> advantage, IMNHO.
>
> Bill
>
>
<snip Pal's negativity>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial
Coverage Lenses)


> I agree with Mark.
>
> Ciao,
> Graywolf
> http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto

> I got to use an *ist-D quite a bit last weekend and I disagree strongly
> with both of those points.
>
> -- 
> Mark Roberts
> Photography and writing
> www.robertstech.com
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to