I agree with Mark. Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:28 PM Subject: Re: *istD and the future (WAS: Re: Digital Formats and Partial Coverage Lenses) > P�l Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I'm afraid I'm not very optimistic regarding the *ist D's fate in the > >marketplace. There are three fundamental problems with the camera: > >1) it is not entry level enough to make an impact. By this I mean it is > >just a "me too" compared to the D10 and the D100 and has no obvious > >price advantage compared to those. It will face hard competition from > >forthcoming, cheaper DSLR's. 2) Design. The *istD is ugly with no design > >flair thats going to convince anyone. > > I got to use an *ist-D quite a bit last weekend and I disagree strongly > with both of those points. > > -- > Mark Roberts > Photography and writing > www.robertstech.com > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.509 / Virus Database: 306 - Release Date: 8/12/03
