On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 03:48:41 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [...] why would the chromatic aberration be worse or show up > worse on a digital rather than a film camera?
I can think of a couple of possibilities: 1) greater magnification from the smaller sensor means _everything_ is bigger, including the artifacts of aberrations 2) the difference between the "random" distribution of film grains compared to the rigidly defined distribution of sensor pixels means that the aberration artifacts get distributed around randomly on film and therefore diffused, but end up as lines of artifacts on the digital sensor, which makes them more recognizable to the human visual system TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free by Grisoft's AVG. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.525 / Virus Database: 322 - Release Date: 03-10-12
