On 15 Oct 2003 at 9:16, Doug Franklin wrote: > 2) the difference between the "random" distribution of film grains > compared to the rigidly defined distribution of sensor pixels means > that the aberration artifacts get distributed around randomly on film > and therefore diffused, but end up as lines of artifacts on the digital > sensor, which makes them more recognizable to the human visual system
>Also since the discrete pixels of the actual sensor are positioned in a colour matrix colour aberrations are generally exaggerated by the demosaicing algorithm. >Rob Studdert Egad! I actually understand the above. Egad! ;-) Hmmm, this means it's hard to know ahead of time which lenses will work well with a DSLR. Because film may not indicate real chromatic aberration problems. Right? Marnie aka Doe I mean the lens might appear to be fine with film, but oops...
