On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Cotty wrote: > On 15/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: > >It's the moon. I posted this to show how much less distortion there is > >using just the center of this lens instead of full frame. > > Right. So, if it's a 16mm, it's acting like a 24mm on the *ist D, no? If > correct, it's not a bad wide angle at all. That looks perfectly useable > to me Bob. Considering the high cost of ultra wides, I'd say this was a > good budget-conscious solution for the *D
We need to see what the 16-45/4 DA lens will cost too (unless you need something right now, instead of in a few months). I keep looking at very wide angle lenses for use on my *ist D, but I think I'll just wait for the 16-45. alex
