I'm curious about the DA lenses too. Figure the Zenit will serve until they become available.
Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "alex wetmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "pentax list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 5:27 PM Subject: Re: Zenit 16mm Fisheye & *istD > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Cotty wrote: > > On 15/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: > > >It's the moon. I posted this to show how much less distortion there is > > >using just the center of this lens instead of full frame. > > > > Right. So, if it's a 16mm, it's acting like a 24mm on the *ist D, no? If > > correct, it's not a bad wide angle at all. That looks perfectly useable > > to me Bob. Considering the high cost of ultra wides, I'd say this was a > > good budget-conscious solution for the *D > > We need to see what the 16-45/4 DA lens will cost too (unless you need > something right now, instead of in a few months). I keep looking at > very wide angle lenses for use on my *ist D, but I think I'll just > wait for the 16-45. > > alex > >
