Non-slr digitals includes an awful lot of 'prosumer' models way above what is available for film.
What we are suggesting is that you have 4 choices: Keep with the MZ-50 untilyou give up waiting for a similarly cheap digital SLR and give a camera manufacturer a lot of your money.. Give a lot of money to a camera manufacturer for a DSLR before then. Be forced to accept what a 'non-slr' digi will do. Buy second hand DSLR (the only cheap way to own one) and help fund someone else giving yet more money to a camera manufacturer for the latest product. > -----Original Message----- > From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 November 2003 13:46 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Digital/Film body pricing (was: A conversation > with Noritsu.) > > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Honestly, the P&S digitals will be all that the mass market really > > wants or needs. > > I beg your pardon? Why is a P&S digital different to its mode > of use and audience to a film P&S? Why am I, the cheap, > consumer SLR equipment customer, to be satisfied with this > kind of crap (which, by the way, also suffers from immense > shutter lag)? > > What you are saying suggests that I should sit on the MZ-50 > for 5 years or so, because it will be worth the equivalent of > what I paid new for it. > > Kostas > >
