Huh? I don't necessarily dispute the second part, but where did you get the warrant part from? I didn't make a statement either way about needing a warrant. Obviously if they're recording your movement in public they don't need a warrant. You're saying the same thing I am.
chris On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, graywolf wrote: > You think they have to have a warrant to do surveillance in public places? > Chris, you are a bit naive. > > Chris Brogden wrote: > > > Which means that it's perfectly fine for the > > police or government to photograph you without your knowledge or > > permission at any time, and to record your movements and activities on > > video, also without your knowledge or permission. Then it's okay for them > > to do whatever they want with that info, as it took place in public. > > Welcome to a Big Brother-style police state. That may be your ideal > > society, but it sure the hell ain't mine.
