Shel Belinkoff wrote: > I suppose another way of phrasing my response would be, at what point is it > "fun" to make a photo of a fat person? In what setting would it be more > acceptable? For example, had this woman been sitting without the coke in > front of her, or the menu behind her, might this have been a fun foto? How > would it be different if we didn't see her face, yet saw her body, in the same > setting? > > shel >
I think you are misunderstanding, Shel -- The sign in juxtaposition with the coke on the counter and her clutching a bottle, were she an appealing person, or neutral or you couldnt see her face would have been a funny sign shot - nothing to do with what is really going on. For a comment on our National unhealthfulness due to overeating, showing the body without the face would suffice. ann > > Ann Sanfedele wrote: > > > It's extremely cruel, Shel - you certainly have not shown it to anyone. > > If she were not so pathologically obese the shot with the sign in it and > > her clutching the bottle would have been fun. > >
