Herb wrote:
> ... 58mm for that wide means a slow lens and that means for
> the times when you want shallow depth of field, you won't
> be able to get it.
Hmmmmm, with the small sensors and shorter lenses used
in current (relatively affordable) digital systems isn't
shallow DOF one of the sacrifices one must endure?
I suppose uou could take these sort of shots w/ a tele
at some extreme distance, but don't the techniques, lenses
and results we are used to now leave a bit to be desired?
Bill
... who is currently checking out a Casio QV-R40 for
a friend interested in a "no-brainer" digi P&S. It seems
an interesting device for the intended purpose, but my
ancient computer has no USB ports! - so I'm somewhat limited
I'll try out the card reader print kiosk at the local
MallWart, as that will probably be how my friend will be
using it anyway.
---------------------------------------------------------
Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast
http://www.orednet.org/~bcasselb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------
